Generalnie większość współczesnej medycy jest gorsza niż Voodoo, poprzez mistyfikację covidową większość ludzi zetknęła się z nieustraszonymi łowcami wirusów, ale goście „leczący” raka bynajmniej w niczym im nie ustępują:
The American Cancer Society has close connections to the mammography industry. Five radiologists have served as ACS presidents, and the ACS promotes the interests of the major manufacturers of mammogram machines and films, including Siemens, DuPont, General Electric, Eastman Kodak, and Piker. The mammography industry also conducts research for the ACS and its grantees, serves on advisory boards, and donates considerable funds. DuPont is a substantial backer of the ACS Breast Health Awareness Program. It sponsors television shows and other media productions touting mammography. It produces advertising, promotional, and information literature for hospitals, clinics, medical organizations, and doctors. It produces educational films; and, of course, it lobbies Congress for legislation promoting the availability of mammography services. Since mammography screening is a profit-driven technology, the ACS has been and remains strongly linked with the mammography industry.
The “irony” of mammograms is that breast tissue is bombarded with a type of radiation that, with sufficient exposure, will cause cancer. Women over forty are urged to get at least two mammograms a year (two exposures of radiation a year). With sufficient exposure, cancer finally appears and the doctors proudly boast to have “caught it in the early stages.” If there had been no mammograms performed, then likely breast cancer would not have occurred. Instead the hapless victims are relieved it was discovered “in the early stages” and happily accept chemo over mutilation as their only early choice for survival. They never associate those semi-annual radiation treatments with the generation of their breast cancers.
The search for a cancer cure has proven to be one of the most lucrative markets in our society. It must be said that the American Cancer Society has not cornered the cancer cure market. Dana-Farber Institute is right there in the running. They are not slouches, with David Nathan, President Emeritus, taking home a cool million in salary. The Cancer Research Institute lags slightly behind with Executive Director Jill O’Donnell-Torme with a mere $335,000.
There are others who have cut themselves in for a piece of the action. Some lesser known names as Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation with executive director Scott Santarella with only $200,000.
Breast cancer has become big business simply because they haven’t found the cause or the cure. Like other medical research societies, not finding the cause or cure keeps these lucrative ventures alive and well. Finding the cause and cure of a disease or disorder, even though that has never happened, would be the end of that particular program.
Radiation from routine mammography poses significant risks of initiating and promoting benign tumors in the patient receiving the X-rays. They are creating their own diseases. Once the patient develops 2 or 3 benign tumors, the doctor may then biopsy of one of the tumors, causing that particular tumor to become malignant. This may then be followed by chemotherapy, which suppresses the immune system and which leads to cancer of the entire bloodstream. This is often followed by more drugs and often leads to a horrible death. Convention assures us that radiation exposure from mammography is trivial. That is, according to “medical studies and statistics”. It is not true according to anyone who has the ability to see and possesses the ability to believe what he sees. An interesting note, not to my surprise, Myra Biblowit, President of The Breast Cancer Research Foundation receives an annual salary of $500,000!
The Great White Hoax
The Suppressed Truth About the Pharmaceutical Industry
(2nd Edition, Revised)
Robert E. Catalano
https://varapanno.blogspot.com/2024/02/cancer-industry.html?m=1
Brak komentarzy:
Prześlij komentarz