O 9/11. To dla zwolenników rzeczy dziwnych i niesamowitych. Autorka jest naukowcem i faktycznie absolutnie nie zajmuje się tu żydami – co na pewnym poziomie mogłoby wydawać się odwracaniem uwagi – koncentruje się nie na kto? ale jak? i dowodzi że normalne wyjaśnienie: wysadzenie budynku materiałami wybuchowymi, też raczej nie miało miejsca.
Niestety jako zero matematyczno/fizyczne, pewne argumenty są dla mnie poza możliwością zweryfikowania, natomiast całkiem spora lista anomali faktycznie wydaje się potwierdzać tezę tej Pani.
“Where did the towers go?”
Conclusions and Summary
In boiling water, the water’s hydrogen and oxygen molecules repel one another, and, in the case of WTC2, it looked as if the building’s own molecules were suddenly repelling each other. What I saw, and what we all now see, in Figure 495, is not rising smoke or trailing cloud, but, instead, what we see is an energised propulsion. We are not looking at signs of a force that caused the building to slam down into the ground at a rate faster than “free fall.” We are looking at signs of a force, instead, that turned the building to dust before it even had a chance to get to the ground. The official explanation—along with all theories of controlled demolition, thermite, and so on—would have us believe that we are looking at a gravity-driven collapse. And yet, hard as it may be to believe, what we are seeing in the Figure 497 photograph is not a building in collapse, but a building being disintegrated into parts so small that it will, in practical terms, disappear. As for it not being a “collapse” we’re looking at, consider the simple fact that some of the “dust” ejecta is actually being propelled upward.
2. FACT: Approximately 1,400 motor vehicles were toasted in strange ways during the destruction of the Twin Towers. WHY AND HOW?
3. FACT: During destruction, there appeared alongside the buildings curious cork screw trails, called in this book Sillystrings. WHY?
4. FACT: During the demise of each tower, large enough volumes of dust made of nano-sized particles went up, enough to block out 100% of sunlight in some areas.
This nano-sized particulate dust in volume enough to achieve sun-light-blocking density constituted the remains of the greatest part of the destroyed buildings’ material substance. WHAT CAUSED THIS DUST TO FORM?
5. FACT: During the destruction, there was an absence of high heat. Witnesses reported that the initial dust cloud felt cooler than ambient temperatures.
Additionally, there was scant evidence of burned bodies, although in one case a man was described as “crisped” even while his jacket remained uncrisped, indicating an “inside-out” combustion not possible with conventional fire. WHAT CAUSED THESE PHENOMENA?
6. FACT: Evidence that the WTC dust continued to break down and become finer and finer long after 9/11 itself came through the observable presence of Fuzzballs. WHAT CAUSES THIS PHENOMENON?
itd
https://varapanno.blogspot.com/2023/05/where-did-towers-go.html?m=0
Autorka twierdzi że użyta technologia może być związana z tak zwanym Hutchison effect.
Tu strona entuzjastów
https://www.hutchisoneffect.com/
Tu znacznie bardziej sceptyczny artykuł
https://www.damninteresting.com/retired/the-hutchison-effect/
Nie mniej faktycznie nie wszystko co miało miejsce da się wyjaśnić zwykłym użyciem materiałów wybuchowych.
Tu można zapoznać się z całą książką
Brak komentarzy:
Prześlij komentarz