Wiesel’s Decision Is Consistent with the Reality of Life in the Camps, Not the Holocaust

 

1. 

   err

   No z tym wyzwoleniem przez sowietów to raczej dwuznaczna historia. Te żydy które tylko mogły się ruszać, spieprzaly ile sił w nogach przed takim wyzwoleniem, razem z Niemcami.

   Pewno żydy komuchy tak nie panikowały, jak inne, ale to też nie wiadomo, bo jeżeli dali się wziąść do niewoli podczas wojny, to od razu stawali się elementem podejrzanym, nie skorzystali odpowiednio z ostatniej kuli ..
   **

   Wiesel’s Decision Is Consistent with the Reality of Life in the Camps, Not the Holocaust

   While there were no doubt individual instances of German brutality toward Jewish detainees in the camps, there was no German-government-ordered extermination plan at Birkenau. Thus, Wiesel’s decision to remain with the Germans makes sense only if he believed that the German program involved the ethnic relocation of Jews to work camps in Germany and farther to the east in order to force them to work on behalf of the German war effort, and not to kill them. His decision to remain in German custody makes no sense, however, within the context of the Holocaust.

   In summary, Wiesel’s decision to evacuate the Auschwitz Camp with the retreating German “war criminals,” instead of remaining behind to be liberated by the Soviets, offers yet another insight into what was actually happening at Auschwitz. Many Jews were in fact deported from Germany and other European countries, spent time in camps, and were then transported farther to the east. In Wiesel’s case, he and his family were imported into the Reich to work in support of the German war effort, and if they were not always treated as humanely as in this episode, they were certainly not subjected to an industrial-scale extermination policy, as the Holocaust myth claims.

   Thus, Wiesel’s decision to leave Auschwitz with the Germans is quite consistent with the reality of wartime Jewish suffering, but not with that of Holocaust fantasy. The latter is an exaggeration of the historical facts in order to justify, among other things, 1) German payment of restitution to Jews, 2) Jewish conquest and confiscation of Palestine, and 3) placement of guilt for war crimes solely on Germany. Thus, Wiesel’s decision, made within the horrible context of total war, signals his conviction at the time that the Germans had treated him relatively well. Not only had they provided him with medical care, they also offered the same level of care to his ailing father, even though the latter was never able to work.

   Primo Levi and Lili Jacob Were Also Treated in the SS Hospital

   One detainee who stayed behind was Lili Jacob. She later discovered the collection of photos that would come to be called The Auschwitz Album. By her own admission, she appears to have been treated well by the Germans before they left. According to the New York Times:273

   On the day Auschwitz was liberated by Allied troops in December 1944 [sic], Lili Jacob was ill with typhus, lying in a camp hospital.

   Primo Levi, who had worked as a lab assistant at the Buna synthetic rubber factory in the Monowitz complex, was also in the hospital with scarlet fever when the Germans left. Although sick and unable to work, he had not been sent to a gas chamber or killed by other means by the Germans either!274 Here again, the story peddled by Holocaust fundamentalists to the effect that sick people were routinely put to death in a gas chamber has proved to be false, for both Lili Jacob and Primo Levi, like Wiesel and his father, were well cared for.

   https://varapanno.blogspot.com/2024/03/wiesels-existential-act-speaks-louder.html?m=1